INTRODUCTION

Kenyans overwhelmingly ushered in our current constitution on the promise of devolution which they felt result in increased grass root
access to resources and political power. Indeed people’s expectations of county governments continue to be extremely high.

While most county governments tend appreciate this fact and try to capitalize on low hanging fruits as soon as they kick off, others prefer to spend the nascent stages laying the ground work and planning elaborately for delivery. Irrespective of leadership styles may differ, what
is critical is for people to feel the impact of devolution in their daily lives.

County governments need to fully decipher the perceptions of their residents and develop strategies that are concomitant with their
expectations.

It’s against this back drop that Infotrak Research developed the CountyTrak™ Performance Index to provide Citizens’ Scorecard of
their County governments against set key performance indicators.

The CountyTrak™ Methodology

The CountyTrak Methodology

 

  • Our current index was conducted between July– August 2023, covering all the 47 counties,
    290 constituencies and 1450 wards with an overall sample of 36,200. Each county was treated
    as an individual universe and assigned a cluster sample which ranged between 600 and 2000
    respondents guided by the population and number of wards in the respective counties. Within
    each county, sampling frames were designed using population proportionate to size guided by
    census data and catered for demographics such as age, gender etc. Data was collected
    through Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) and analysed using SPSS.

 

  • The CountyTrak tool consisted of twelve core functions with thirty three key performance
    indicators and five approval rating questions. The functions included: Agriculture, Health,
    Education, Roads & Transport, Energy, Water management, Environment & natural resources
    management, Trade & Tourism, County Planning & Development, Housing, Lands & settlement,
    Culture & Sports and Social Services. Also covered was Public Participation, Planning, and
    Management of County Resources.
  • The final questionnaire was structured with using 1-10 Likert scale being applied on each
    indicator where 1 was very poor and 10 was excellent. The mean was computed for each Sub-
    Indicator of the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) to get the Index for that Specific KPI. The
    Overall County performance Index was then computed by taking the average of the KPIs.

This Index is the first of its kind and magnitude in Kenya. It provides the county governments and other
interested stakeholders with robust statistics by ward on the perception of county residents over county
governments’ performance of the devolved functions.

Raphael Mulwa

MD, Infotrak Research

The County Functions Covered

Under the other key functions, we included the following:

  • Making it difficult for people to access hard drugs (bhang, khat, illicit brews, etc.) and pornography? (i.e. licensing, enforcement, registration etc..)
  • Ensuring county government services are available in your ward
  • Preventing corruption (i.e. zero tolerance to corruption and taking action on alleged corruption cases)

SAMPLE (N) FOR EACH COUNTY

County

CountyTrak Sample per County (n)

Margin of Error

@ 95% degree of confidence

NAIROBI

2000

±2.2%

KAKAMEGA

1500

±2.5%

KIAMBU

1500

±2.5%

NAKURU

1200

±2.8%

BUNGOMA

1000

±3.1%

KISII

1000

±3.1%

MERU

1000

±3.1%

BARINGO

800

±3.5%

BUSIA

800

±3.5%

GARISSA

600

±4%

HOMA BAY

800

±3.5%

KERICHO

800

±3.5%

KILIFI

800

±3.5%

KISUMU

800

±3.5%

KITUI

800

±3.5%

MACHAKOS

800

±3.5%

MAKUENI

600

±4%

MANDERA

600

±4%

MIGORI

800

±3.5%

MOMBASA

600

±4%

MURANGA

800

±3.5%

NANDI

800

±3.5%

NAROK

800

±3.5%

NYAMIRA

600

±4%

County CountyTrak Sample per County (n)

Margin of Error

@ 95% degree of confidence

NYERI 800 ±3.5%
SIAYA 600 ±4%
TURKANA 800 ±3.5%
UASIN GISHU 800 ±3.5%
WAJIR 600 ±4%
BOMET 600 ±4%
ELGEYO MARAKWET 600 ±4%
EMBU 600 ±4%
ISIOLO 600 ±4%
KAJIADO 600 ±4%
KIRINYAGA 600 ±4%
KWALE 600 ±4%
LAIKIPIA 600 ±4%
LAMU 600 ±4%
MARSABIT 600 ±4%
NYANDARUA 600 ±4%
SAMBURU 600 ±4%
TAITA TAVETA 600 ±4%
TANA RIVER 600 ±4%
THARAKA-NITHI 600 ±4%
TRANS NZOIA 600 ±4%
VIHIGA 600 ±4%
WEST POKOT 600 ±4%
TOTAL 36,200

STATUS OF THE COUNTIES

Focusing on development how would you compare your county of residence now and before the introduction of devolution in 2013?

%

Better than before

%

Same as before

%

Worse than before

ELECTED LEADERS PERFORMANCE RATING 2023

error: Content is protected !!